The Sunni Voice

:: Abd Al Mustafa's Corner ::

  • “Let not respect for people prevent a person from speaking the truth when they know it.” (Tirmidhi)
  • July 2019
    M T W T F S S
    « Apr    
    1234567
    891011121314
    15161718192021
    22232425262728
    293031  
  • category

  • Global Visitors

  • Stats

    • 269,744 visitors
  • Admin

  • SunniVoice's Flickr

  • Advertisements

Archive for the ‘deobandi’ Category

Women visiting graves

Posted by Abd Al Mustafa on Tuesday 30th June, 2009

The most correct position is that the dispensation (rukhsa) for the visitation of graves is firmly established for women………..[ibn abidin]

Advertisements

Posted in deoband, deobandi, fiqh, hadith, islam, madina, makkah, muslim, polemics, religion, scholars, signs of allah, the prophet, wahabi, ziyarah | Leave a Comment »

ikhtilafu ummati rahmatun li al-nas

Posted by Abd Al Mustafa on Friday 19th June, 2009

‘It would not please me more if the Companions of Muhammad (s) did not differ among them, because had they not differed there would be no leeway (for us)’……..Umar ibn `Abd al-`Aziz (ra).

Posted in deobandi, fiqh, general, hadith, islam, madina, makkah, masjid, moonsighting, mosque, muslim, polemics, religion, scholars, signs of allah, the prophet, unity, wahabi | Leave a Comment »

Dua is Worship

Posted by Abd Al Mustafa on Thursday 18th June, 2009

They cite the hadith: “inna al-du`a huwa al-`ibada”: “Invocation — it is worship.”[45] Hence, they claim, he who asks help from a prophet or a saint (wali) is simply worshipping him by that request for help; yet only worship of Allah alone is beneficial and worship of other than Him is shirk.  Hence, they conclude, the one who seeks aid of someone other than Him is an idolater.

The answer for this is that the verbal pronoun huwa (“it is”) in the hadith conveys restriction of the grammatical predicate “worship” to its subject “invocation” and it thus renders definite the predicate, just as the author of al-Miftah[46] says and with whom the majority of the scholars agree concerning this hadith.  Thus, for example, when we say: “Allah — He is the Provider” (Allah huwa al-Razzaq) (51:58), it means there is no provider other than He.  Accordingly, when the Prophet said: “Invocation: it is worship” he signified that worship is restricted to invocation.  What is meant by the hadith is:

             “Worship is nothing other than invocation.”

And the Qur’an supports this meaning when it says: “Say: My Lord would not concern Himself with you but for your call (du`a) on Him” (25:77).  That is, He would not have shown favor to you were it not for your worship. For the honor of mankind lies in its worship and its respect in its knowledge and obedience. Otherwise, man would not be superior to the beasts. The Hajj, the Zakat, the Fast and the testimony of faith are all invocation and likewise reading of the Qur’an, dhikr or remembrance, and obedience.  Hence, worship is confined to invocation. Once this is firmly established, it becomes clear that there no proof in the hadith for what Wahhabis claim, because if asking for help is a kind of invocation, as the Wahhabis claim, it does not necessarily follow that asking for help is worship, since invocation is not always worship as is plain to see.[47]

 If, on the contrary, we restrict the subject “invocation” to the predicate “worship” in the hadith according to the interpretation of the author of al-Kashshaf [48] whereby the definition of the predicate in a nominal clause might be either restricted to the subject or restricted to the predicate, then the logical deduction of the Wahhabis whereby all du`a is worship is still not supported by it.  Otherwise, the definite article al in al-du`a (invocation or literally a call on someone) makes invocation generic and betokens universal inclusion into the genus. Yet this is not the case since not every invocation is an act of worship (`ibada).

On the contrary, the matter stands as we find it in the verse of Qur’an: “Nor call on other than Allah such as can neither profit thee nor hurt thee” (10:106) and similarly in  the verse: “Call your witnesses or helpers!” (2:23). Calling on Allah in the sense of requesting is found where the Qur’an says: “Call on Me and I will answer you” (40:60) and in the sense of a declarative statement: “This will be their prayer (da`wahum) therein: Glory  to Thee, O Allah!” (10:10). As for “calling on someone” in the sense of summoning them (nida’), we find: “It will be on the day when he will call you (yad`ukum)” (17:52) and in the sense of naming someone we find: “Deem not the calling (du`a) of the Messenger of Allah among yourselves like the calling of one of you to another” (24:63).

 As the author of al-Itqan[49] makes plain: If the definite article belongs to the genus and signifies universal inclusion therein, then the man who says: “Zayd! Give me a dirham” perpetrates an act of disbelief. Yet the Wahhabis, of course, will not claim this. Hence, it is plain that the definite article signifies specification.  So what is meant by invocation in the hadith is invocation to Allah and not calling on someone in the general sense.  The meaning would be:

         “Calling to Allah is one of the greatest acts of worship.”

 It is in the manner of the Prophet’s saying: “al-hajju `arafatun” or:

         “The Pilgrimage is `Arafah”[50]

which is taken to mean that this represents the Hajj’s greatest essential element. For the one making the request comes toward Allah and turns aside from what is other than He.  Furthermore, the request is commanded by Allah and the action fulfilling that command is worship.  The Prophet names it “worship” to show the subjugation of the subject making the request, the indigence of his condition, and the humility and lowliness of his worship.

 Among the proofs that what is meant by “invocation” in the hadith is the “calling on Allah” and not the general sense of “calling” is the fact which many grammarians confirm and Ibn Rushd clearly makes plain as does al-Qarafi also in his Commentary on al-Tanqih:[51] namely, that asking (al-su’al) is one of the categories of wanting (al-talab) put forth by one lower to one higher in station.  If it is addressed to Allah, it is named “request” (su’al) and “invocation” (du`a).  The latter is not applied to someone other than Allah. And if it is not permissible (la yajuz) to name the request of other than Allah by the unqualified name of du`a, then such a request a fortiori is not named a du`a in the sense of worship. [source]

Posted in aqida, awliya allah, deoband, deobandi, general, hadith, hajj, islam, muslim, polemics, quran, religion, scholars, signs of allah, sufi, sufism, Tasawwuf, the prophet, unity, wahabi | 1 Comment »

What is Hadra.?

Posted by Abd Al Mustafa on Wednesday 6th May, 2009

Until recent years the hadra was totally alien to the muslims of the sub-continent. When students from the region were starting to travel to the mid-east to sit with the ulama of the arab world, they at one point or other were witnesses to something which they had no knowledge of. Thus, getting confused about how this singing and dancing could have anything to do with islam.

Shaykh Nuh Ha Mim Keller writes;  I was one of those who asked our sheikh about the relation of the hadra to the shari‘a or “Sacred Law” which is the guiding light of our tariqa. As Muslims, our submission to the law is total, and there are no thoughts or opinions after legally answering the question “Does the hadra agree with orthodox Islam?

 

see also; the legality of raqs  and this and The Whirling Dervishes

Posted in aqida, awliya allah, deoband, deobandi, fiqh, hadith, islam, muslim, polemics, religion, scholars, sufi, sufism, Tasawwuf, the prophet, unity, wahabi | 2 Comments »

Shariah & Tariqah

Posted by Abd Al Mustafa on Friday 24th April, 2009

Hazrat Junaid Baghdadi Radi Allahu `anhu, was asked about some people who were proud of the fact that by following command of Shariah they had become “Joined” (Wasil) and they did not need Shariah any more, then he replied “They are telling the truth they have become Wasil (Joined) but unto What? unto Hell.”

He added:

“The thieves and adulterers are better than the people of such faith. If I live for a thousand years I shall neither reduce any obligation and Wajibats (expedients) nor shall I without any excuse of Shariah reduce the number of Nawafil (supplementary prayers) and Musta-habat (preferable religious acts) which I have fixed for myself. So, for the people all other ways except the way of the Holy Prophet sall Allahu `alayhi wa sallam, are closed…..read on

Posted in aqida, awliya allah, deoband, deobandi, fiqh, hadith, islam, madina, makkah, masjid, mosque, muslim, poetry & praises, polemics, quran, religion, scholars, signs of allah, sufi, sufism, Tasawwuf, the prophet, unity, wahabi | Leave a Comment »